Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S261688AbSJAOxr>; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 10:53:47 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S261690AbSJAOxr>; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 10:53:47 -0400
Received: from inje.iskon.hr ([213.191.128.16]:47862 "EHLO inje.iskon.hr")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S261688AbSJAOxq>;
	Tue, 1 Oct 2002 10:53:46 -0400
To: Alessandro Suardi <alessandro.suardi@oracle.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Shared memory shmat/dt not working well in 2.5.x
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210011401360.991-100000@localhost.localdomain>
	<3D99A2F2.70102@oracle.com> <dnelbaclvo.fsf@magla.zg.iskon.hr>
	<3D99B672.2090805@oracle.com>
Reply-To: zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr
X-Face: s71Vs\G4I3mB$X2=P4h[aszUL\%"`1!YRYl[JGlC57kU-`kxADX}T/Bq)Q9.$fGh7lFNb.s
 i&L3xVb:q_Pr}>Eo(@kU,c:3:64cR]m@27>1tGl1):#(bs*Ip0c}N{:JGcgOXd9H'Nwm:}jLr\FZtZ
 pri/C@\,4lW<|jrq^<):Nk%Hp@G&F"r+n1@BoH
From: Zlatko Calusic <zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr>
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 16:59:08 +0200
In-Reply-To: <3D99B672.2090805@oracle.com> (Alessandro Suardi's message of
 "Tue, 01 Oct 2002 16:51:30 +0200")
Message-ID: <dnsmzqb3yb.fsf@magla.zg.iskon.hr>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090005 (Oort Gnus v0.05) XEmacs/21.4 (Honest Recruiter,
 i386-debian-linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1693
Lines: 40

Alessandro Suardi <alessandro.suardi@oracle.com> writes:

> Zlatko Calusic wrote:
>
>>>I'm glad to report that Oracle 9.2 is now able to start once again
>>>  on 2.5.x series :)
>>>
>>>Thanks, cool work as always !
>> Was it a known problem for some time?
>> I haven't been testing 2.5.x series for some time, and also haven't
>> read linux-kernel list last few months, so I don't know exact history
>> of the bug. If you can enlighten me, I'm just curious... :)
>> I rememeber other more complicated bugs from the older 2.5.x kernels,
>> and now I'll test if they're solved in newer ones. I might need some
>> help if they still exist (could you lend me a hand if that's the
>> case?) as I was getting Oracle internal error - coredump - with only
>> one meaningful sentence (at least to me :)). Google was silent on the
>> case. :(
>
> I reported the issue on l-k the other day:
>
> http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0209.3/1691.html

I see. Same day I decided to dig deeper. :)

>
> The more complicated bug you're talking about is the exec_mmap
>   change introduced in 2.5.19 and fixed a handful of versions
>   later, possibly .28, where PMON wouldn't start after 120"...
>   I guess :)

Great. Thanks for the useful info.

It looks that there's a chance I will do only the interesting
benchmarking part. :) I'm quite curious how Andrew's work in 2.5.x
will affect performance of Oracle database.

Thanks for everything.
-- 
Zlatko
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/