Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 13:10:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 13:10:29 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-043-077.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.43.77]:23708 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 13:08:52 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Rik van Riel Subject: Re: 2.4 mm trouble [possible lru race] Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 19:10:20 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Richard.Zidlicky@stud.informatik.uni-erlangen.de, , , References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 847 Lines: 21 On Tuesday 01 October 2002 18:56, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > On Tuesday 01 October 2002 16:20, Richard.Zidlicky@stud.informatik.uni-erlangen.de wrote: > > > > no preempt or anything fancy, m68k vanila 2.4.19 (well almost). > > > > Vanilla would be CONFIG_SMP=y, is that what you have? > > Somehow I doubt Linux supports m68k SMP machines ;) CONFIG_SMP=y works perfectly well on single cpu machines - it forces the spinlocks to actually exist. It's not supposed to change any behaviour, but you never know. Behaviour is obviously changing here. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/