Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754242Ab3E1Tb0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2013 15:31:26 -0400 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:36114 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753202Ab3E1TbZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 May 2013 15:31:25 -0400 Message-ID: <51A505DB.2090409@oracle.com> Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 15:30:35 -0400 From: Sasha Levin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130527 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Zijlstra CC: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] liblockdep: Wrap kernel/lockdep.c to allow usage from userspace References: <1368674141-10796-1-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.com> <1368674141-10796-3-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.com> <20130522091718.GE18810@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> In-Reply-To: <20130522091718.GE18810@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1468 Lines: 50 On 05/22/2013 05:17 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:15:34PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/tools/lib/lockdep/uinclude/linux/lockdep.h >> @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ >> +#ifndef _LIBLOCKDEP_LOCKDEP_H_ >> +#define _LIBLOCKDEP_LOCKDEP_H_ >> + >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> + >> + >> +#define MAX_LOCK_DEPTH 2000UL >> + >> +#include "../../../include/linux/lockdep.h" >> + >> +struct task_struct { >> + u64 curr_chain_key; >> + int lockdep_depth; >> + unsigned int lockdep_recursion; >> + struct held_lock held_locks[MAX_LOCK_DEPTH]; >> + gfp_t lockdep_reclaim_gfp; >> + int pid; >> + char comm[17]; >> +}; > > Whee that's a totally awesome MAX_LOCK_DEPTH.. :-) > > Should we not also extend the other static allocations, or have you not > yet ran into them? I would suspect that without proper classes we're > bound to run out of class and link storage quite quickly. I've changed MAX_LOCK_DEPTH just because I've actually hit it. I haven't got around to hitting anything else, but I guess we could preemptively send them hight. What values would make sense here? Thanks, Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/