Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 14:14:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 14:14:58 -0400 Received: from mail-7.tiscali.it ([195.130.225.153]:6730 "EHLO mail.tiscali.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 14:14:57 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Lorenzo Allegrucci Organization: -ENOENT To: Daniel Phillips , Rik van Riel Subject: Re: qsbench, interesting results Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 20:18:56 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200210012018.56145.l.allegrucci@tiscalinet.it> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 752 Lines: 18 On Tuesday 01 October 2002 19:03, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On Tuesday 01 October 2002 18:52, Rik van Riel wrote: > > Having the working set of one process larger than RAM is > > a highly unusual case ... > > No it's not, it's very similar to having several processes active whose > working sets add up to more than RAM. qsbench has a "-p" option to distribute the load on multiple processes. I think the actual code is too trivial to simulate a realistic multithreaded workload, but it might be improved.. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/