Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 14:56:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 14:56:32 -0400 Received: from carisma.slowglass.com ([195.224.96.167]:50959 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 14:56:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 20:01:43 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Petr Vandrovec , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Shared memory shmat/dt not working well in Message-ID: <20021001200142.A31614@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Hugh Dickins , Petr Vandrovec , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <35FD2132190@vcnet.vc.cvut.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from hugh@veritas.com on Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 06:14:04PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 733 Lines: 14 On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 06:14:04PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote: > And looks to me like mprotect_fixup, in the merge case, may be passing > an already freed vma to change_protection. I'm not as confident about > this patch as the earlier one, but I believe it's correct: please > give it a try, and maybe Christoph will confirm or deny it. Looks good. My intial patch didn't do the the change_protection at all, and it looks like the fix someone (akpm?) submitted wasn't exactly correct. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/