Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 15:53:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 15:53:48 -0400 Received: from stingr.net ([212.193.32.15]:14855 "EHLO hq.stingr.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 15:53:47 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 23:59:14 +0400 From: Paul P Komkoff Jr To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: [STUPID TESTCASE] ext3 htree vs. reiserfs on 2.5.40-mm1 Message-ID: <20021001195914.GC6318@stingr.net> Mail-Followup-To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Agent Darien Fawkes X-Mailer: Intel Ultra ATA Storage Driver X-RealName: Stingray Greatest Jr Organization: Department of Fish & Wildlife Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1127 Lines: 31 This is the stupidiest testcase I've done but it worth seeing (maybe) We create 300000 files named from 00000000 to 000493E0 in one directory, then delete it in order. Tests taken on ext3+htree and reiserfs. ext3 w/o htree hadn't evaluated because it will take long long time ... both filesystems was mounted with noatime,nodiratime and ext3 was data=writeback to be somewhat fair ... real user sys reiserfs: Creating: 3m13.208s 0m4.412s 2m54.404s Deleting: 4m41.250s 0m4.206s 4m17.926s Ext3: Creating: 4m9.331s 0m3.927s 2m21.757s Deleting: 9m14.838s 0m3.446s 1m39.508s htree improved this a much but it still beaten by reiserfs. seems odd to me - deleting taking twice time then creating ... -- Paul P 'Stingray' Komkoff 'Greatest' Jr /// (icq)23200764 /// (http)stingr.net When you're invisible, the only one really watching you is you (my keychain) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/