Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 13:15:15 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/9] liblockdep: Support using LD_PRELOAD
Message-ID: <20130529111515.GG12193@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <1368674141-10796-1-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.com>
 <1368674141-10796-8-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.com>
 <20130522092453.GH18810@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <51A50708.3000203@oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51A50708.3000203@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 821
Lines: 19

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 03:35:36PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 05/22/2013 05:24 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Do we still need this with the glibc __pthread_* static initialization?
> 
> Sadly we do.
> 
> We need to deal with the two things that cause allocation in our code (because
> they loop back into our code via malloc()->malloc_init()->pthread_mutex_init() ).
> 
> The first one was the glibc trick to avoid the malloc() caused by dlsym(). The
> second one is the malloc() we do when we allocate new lock. Static allocation
> deals with that one.

OK.. fair enough
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/