Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S262534AbSJAUoF>; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 16:44:05 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S262535AbSJAUoF>; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 16:44:05 -0400
Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:4367 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S262534AbSJAUoC>;
	Tue, 1 Oct 2002 16:44:02 -0400
Message-ID: <3D9A0A55.2030605@namesys.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 00:49:25 +0400
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
CC: Paul P Komkoff Jr <i@stingr.net>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       god@namesys.com
Subject: Re: [STUPID TESTCASE] ext3 htree vs. reiserfs on 2.5.40-mm1
References: <20021001195914.GC6318@stingr.net> <3D9A08E1.4040905@namesys.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1370
Lines: 43

Hans Reiser wrote:

> Paul P Komkoff Jr wrote:
>
>> This is the stupidiest testcase I've done but it worth seeing (maybe)
>>
>> We create 300000 files named from 00000000 to 000493E0 in one
>> directory, then delete it in order.
>>
>> Tests taken on ext3+htree and reiserfs. ext3 w/o htree hadn't
>> evaluated because it will take long long time ...
>>
>> both filesystems was mounted with noatime,nodiratime and ext3 was
>> data=writeback to be somewhat fair ...
>>
>>                real               user          sys
>> reiserfs:
>> Creating:     3m13.208s    0m4.412s    2m54.404s
>> Deleting:    4m41.250s    0m4.206s    4m17.926s
>>
>> Ext3:
>> Creating:    4m9.331s    0m3.927s    2m21.757s
>> Deleting:    9m14.838s    0m3.446s    1m39.508s
>>
>> htree improved this a much but it still beaten by reiserfs. seems odd
>> to me - deleting taking twice time then creating ...
>>
>>  
>>
> Can you send us the code so we can try it on reiser4?  We are going to 
> release reiser4 sometime this month (don't ask me when), and we'd be 
> happy to see you run it when you do.

^you^we

Sorry to list for bandwidth waste.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/