Message-ID: <1369872829.22004.129.camel@joe-AO722>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] timer: Fix jiffies wrap behavior of round_jiffies*()
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 17:13:49 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20130529163813.5f637f04.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
References: <519BC066.5080600@acm.org>
	 <20130529160150.f0a498d188dc790d018200e9@linux-foundation.org>
	 <1369869467.22004.122.camel@joe-AO722>
	 <20130529163813.5f637f04.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1089
Lines: 28

On Wed, 2013-05-29 at 16:38 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 29 May 2013 16:17:47 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> 
> > >   We could perhaps have a checkpatch rule
> > > which looks for comparisons against jiffes (and any other
> > > time-measuring variables we can detect)
> > 
> > other variables like?
> 
> Grepping for time_after finds a bunch.  There's no real pattern to it though.

get_jiffies_64() should probably be added as
another test too.

Also, these might be wrong:

arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c:              while (get_jiffies_64() < waitjiffies)
arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c:              while (get_jiffies_64() < waitjiffies)
fs/fuse/dir.c:  else if (fuse_dentry_time(entry) < get_jiffies_64()) {
fs/fuse/dir.c:  if (fi->i_time < get_jiffies_64()) {
fs/fuse/dir.c:          if (fi->i_time < get_jiffies_64()) {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/