Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 18:11:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 18:11:40 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:17426 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 18:11:39 -0400 Message-ID: <3D9A1EC2.2020706@pobox.com> Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 18:16:34 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patrick Mau CC: Linux Kernel Subject: Re: LMbench results for 2.5.40 References: <20021001220853.GA20022@oscar.dorf.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 698 Lines: 21 Patrick Mau wrote: > Hallo, > > these are LMbench results for 2.4.18 and 2.5.40 (two runs). > All results where obtained in single-user mode after a fresh > reboot. > > 2.5.40 was compiled with CONFIG_PREEMPT=n. > > Could someone explain the results I marked with '???' ? > The ones under 'Local Communication Bandwidth'. any chance you can run each set of tests three times? (I know it takes longer, but it's better for statistical purposes...) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/