Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S967865Ab3E3ILu (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 May 2013 04:11:50 -0400 Received: from mail.free-electrons.com ([94.23.35.102]:37387 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966916Ab3E3ILn (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 May 2013 04:11:43 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 10:11:29 +0200 From: Maxime Ripard To: Richard Genoud Cc: davem@davemloft.net, Emilio Lopez , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kevin@allwinnertech.com, sunny@allwinnertech.com, shuge@allwinnertech.com, Stefan Roese , Florian Fainelli , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 RESEND 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Add support for A10 Ethernet controller Message-ID: <20130530081129.GF9799@lukather> References: <1369387394-9453-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1506 Lines: 44 Hi Richard, On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 08:15:49PM +0200, Richard Genoud wrote: > 2013/5/24 Maxime Ripard : > I tested it successfully on cubieboard 1GB, on top of kernel 3.10-rc3, > nfsroot (debian wheezy) > I also added in sun4i-a10-cubieboard.dts > phy0: ethernet-phy@0 { > reg = <1>; > }, > like Emilio suggested. > > running an iperf, there's some good perfs ! > iperf -s > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Server listening on TCP port 5001 > TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > [ 4] local 192.168.1.10 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.232 port 38169 > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth > [ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 112 MBytes 94.1 Mbits/sec > > That's great ! with this patchset, we can now run a server with a > vanilla kernel ( who needs more that a serial port and ethernet, > really ? ;) ) > > Tested-by: Richard Genoud Thanks for testing this. Did you look at the load while iperf was running? I guess we can expect it to be pretty high since it runs without DMA. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/