Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 18:46:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 18:46:25 -0400 Received: from tapu.f00f.org ([66.60.186.129]:58789 "EHLO tapu.f00f.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 18:46:24 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 15:51:52 -0700 From: Chris Wedgwood To: Christoph Hellwig , Linus Torvalds , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux v2.5.40 - and a feature freeze reminder Message-ID: <20021001225152.GA26337@tapu.f00f.org> References: <20021001221421.A7762@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021001221421.A7762@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-No-Archive: Yes Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 825 Lines: 22 On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 10:14:21PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > What about the 64bit sector_t (aka >2TB blockdevice) patches. IMHO > they're a must-have for 2.6 (people already ask for backporting them > to 2.4..) and last time I check Peter had a BK tree with nicely > split changesets. Indeed. I *really* would like to see this. Consider a super-cheap IDE raid setup, 8x320GB drives for a single filesystem. This means the files-system starts are 2.1TB (raid5, more with raid0) and if you want to grow it... --cw (who has lots of DVDs to stream about the house) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/