Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 02:46:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 02:46:52 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:23170 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 02:46:50 -0400 Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 08:51:58 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Kernel Mailing List , peter@chubb.wattle.id.au Subject: Re: Linux v2.5.40 - and a feature freeze reminder Message-ID: <20021002065158.GA3867@suse.de> References: <20021001221421.A7762@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 708 Lines: 20 On Tue, Oct 01 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > What about the 64bit sector_t (aka >2TB blockdevice) patches. > > I think we should do both 64-bit sector_t and 32-bit dev_t, although both > of them depend on how horrible the code ends up being. Example patches? Peter had patches for 64-bit sector_t, and they looked pretty nice. Definitely mergeable. Peter, do you have a recent version? -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/