Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 06:30:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 06:30:12 -0400 Received: from leon-2.mat.uni.torun.pl ([158.75.2.64]:44454 "EHLO leon-2.mat.uni.torun.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 06:30:11 -0400 Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 12:35:21 +0200 (CEST) From: Krzysztof Benedyczak X-X-Sender: golbi@anna To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: POSIX message queues Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 933 Lines: 28 Hello After getting some response from lkml we are ready for work on new version of POSIX message queues. Main difference (as Christoph Hellwig suggested) would be implementing it as a virtual filesystem (based on tmpfs and parts of Jakub Jelinek code). I think that we can agree that idea of moving whole stuff to user space isn't good. There is still a problem with SIGEV_THREAD version of notification but after (brief) looking into NPTL it should be possible to implement (in difference to NGPT) So our question is: Is above version acceptable for Linux kernel? Main advantages of such approach are: no need for new system call and no mess in fork/exit. Krzysztof Benedyczak - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/