Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759233Ab3FCQbu (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jun 2013 12:31:50 -0400 Received: from mail-bl2lp0205.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([207.46.163.205]:46974 "EHLO na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758695Ab3FCQbl (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jun 2013 12:31:41 -0400 From: Matthew Garrett To: joeyli CC: "rja@sgi.com" , "mingo@kernel.org" , "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" , "bp@alien8.de" , "jkosina@suse.cz" , "matt.fleming@intel.com" , "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "hpa@linux.intel.com" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "oneukum@suse.de" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Modify UEFI anti-bricking code Thread-Topic: [PATCH] Modify UEFI anti-bricking code Thread-Index: AQHOXwRQ69J870D+8ESfIa4gHR89tpkkLJYAgAAE7oA= Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 16:31:21 +0000 Message-ID: <1370277079.6315.14.camel@x230.lan> References: <1370117180-1712-1-git-send-email-matthew.garrett@nebula.com> <1370276021.30695.4.camel@linux-s257.site> In-Reply-To: <1370276021.30695.4.camel@linux-s257.site> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.255.84.4] x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:SKI;SFS:;DIR:OUT;SFP:;SCL:-1;SRVR:BL2PR05MB211;H:BL2PR05MB211.namprd05.prod.outlook.com;LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <79898D7D92BE2C4592A79AAD001919B5@namprd05.prod.outlook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: nebula.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id r53GW1Kb009134 Content-Length: 508 Lines: 12 On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 00:13 +0800, joeyli wrote: > Oliver raised a question for if power fails between that succesful > attempt and the deletion? It's a pretty tiny window, but sure. Making sure we delete it seems sensible. In that case we should make the GUID a #define rather than write it out twice. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org ????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay?ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m???? ????????I?