Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754142Ab3FDL5f (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jun 2013 07:57:35 -0400 Received: from mout.perfora.net ([74.208.4.194]:56196 "EHLO mout.perfora.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751210Ab3FDL5c (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jun 2013 07:57:32 -0400 Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 07:56:44 -0400 From: Jim Rees To: Jeff Layton Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, matthew@wil.cx, dhowells@redhat.com, sage@inktank.com, smfrench@gmail.com, swhiteho@redhat.com, Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, piastryyy@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/11] locks: scalability improvements for file locking Message-ID: <20130604115644.GA4180@umich.edu> References: <1370056054-25449-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> <20130603213101.GC2109@fieldses.org> <20130604065417.46080a57@tlielax.poochiereds.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130604065417.46080a57@tlielax.poochiereds.net> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:XVft4ObdFYdY9/aw7zCbQFKwspfoAhI7uNxJ6ws7Jgm N0FMjCcDWsGlNFAdJN4/urwoAfmHDDW4OeKquEM1v/aMlq1bFY BRO9Rla1DWpk0+OM37y2hZLVcH2OpWQLNLV2GH3AkUM8Fk5lzY nrp60rgheXAwNQZpK4VFcYS1cbWgxTy5mJR+xYyePVlPg5Jrel m0MI29Ah6bHg9N3AQuRPbnTLhBP6c3BDond707BiKcwQa9s3+J nPlHSYKIga4SX+dAnimYdM1J/4t6S7CRAhFGEQQp7PMSZhMu60 Ts8OaXn/Zz1dzISc+/8MUe7zHr4BDMbCfi20tCIUhO9qaNe+g= = Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 907 Lines: 20 Jeff Layton wrote: > Might be nice to look at some profiles to confirm all of that. I'd also > be curious how much variation there was in the results above, as they're > pretty close. > The above is just a random representative sample. The results are pretty close when running this test, but I can average up several runs and present the numbers. I plan to get a bare-metal test box on which to run some more detailed testing and maybe some profiling this week. Just contributing more runs into the mean doesn't tell us anything about the variance. With numbers that close you need the variance to tell whether it's a significant change. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/