Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 12:51:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 12:51:50 -0400 Received: from h68-147-110-38.cg.shawcable.net ([68.147.110.38]:16381 "EHLO webber.adilger.int") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 12:51:32 -0400 From: Andreas Dilger Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 10:54:54 -0600 To: Linux Kernel Mailing List , ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [STUPID TESTCASE] ext3 htree vs. reiserfs on 2.5.40-mm1 Message-ID: <20021002165454.GV3000@clusterfs.com> Mail-Followup-To: Linux Kernel Mailing List , ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net References: <20021001195914.GC6318@stingr.net> <20021001204330.GO3000@clusterfs.com> <20021002104859.GD6318@stingr.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021002104859.GD6318@stingr.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-GPG-Key: 1024D/0D35BED6 X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7A37 5D79 BF1B CECA D44F 8A29 A488 39F5 0D35 BED6 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 858 Lines: 22 On Oct 02, 2002 14:48 +0400, Paul P Komkoff Jr wrote: > Unfortunately, there still one issue in ext3. It called "inode limit". > Initially I wanted to run this test on 1000000 files but ... I hit > inode limit and don't want to increase it artificially yet. > > Reiserfs worked fine because it don't have such kind of limit ... We have plans to fix this already, but it is not high enough on anyones priority list quite yet (most filesystems have enough inodes for regular usage). Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/