Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 15:49:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 15:49:34 -0400 Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.106]:42743 "EHLO e6.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 15:49:33 -0400 Importance: Normal Sensitivity: Subject: To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Message-ID: From: "Mark Peloquin" Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 14:58:25 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01ML072/01/M/IBM(Release 5.0.11 |July 29, 2002) at 10/02/2002 03:54:18 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 624 Lines: 17 On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 17:09, Alan Cox wrote: > Look at history - if such a mess got in, it would never get sorted. Instead of throwing around vague statements with little context like "compost heap" and "such a mess", why don't you spell out the specific design points of EVMS that you disagree with. The advantages and disadvantages of each point can then be discussed. Mark - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/