Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751450Ab3FDXj1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jun 2013 19:39:27 -0400 Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:51484 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750791Ab3FDXjZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jun 2013 19:39:25 -0400 From: Joe Perches To: Dave Kleikamp Cc: jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/2] jfs: neatening Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 16:39:14 -0700 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.1.2.459.gbcd45b4.dirty Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1140 Lines: 30 The second patch is speculative and maybe not necessary. Is a 3KB reduction in object size when embedded and !CONFIG_PRINTK worth it? Joe Perches (2): jfs: Update jfs_error jfs: Reduce object size when CONFIG_PRINTK=n fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------------ fs/jfs/jfs_dtree.c | 37 +++++++++++++------------- fs/jfs/jfs_extent.c | 2 +- fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------- fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c | 5 ++-- fs/jfs/jfs_superblock.h | 17 +++++++++++- fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c | 2 +- fs/jfs/jfs_xtree.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- fs/jfs/namei.c | 2 +- fs/jfs/resize.c | 2 +- fs/jfs/super.c | 24 ++++++++++------- fs/jfs/xattr.c | 4 +-- 12 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 154 deletions(-) -- 1.8.1.2.459.gbcd45b4.dirty -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/