Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 18:13:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 18:13:38 -0400 Received: from svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com ([24.136.46.5]:51974 "EHLO svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 18:13:37 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.4.20pre8aa2 From: Robert Love To: "J.A. Magallon" Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20021002214540.GA2589@werewolf.able.es> References: <20021002071110.GC1158@dualathlon.random> <20021002214540.GA2589@werewolf.able.es> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1033597107.27343.44.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.1.1.99 (Preview Release) Date: 02 Oct 2002 18:18:27 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 625 Lines: 20 On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 17:45, J.A. Magallon wrote: > I was rediffing the task_cpu patch, when reached a new hunk in -aa: > > kernel/sched.c::sched_init(void): > > + current->cpu = smp_processor_id(); Ew we do that in 2.5, too. I think this is a mistake; we don't need to do this here. But if I am wrong, we need to get the current processor number elsewhere. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/