Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757131Ab3FETEn (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jun 2013 15:04:43 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f174.google.com ([209.85.192.174]:54355 "EHLO mail-pd0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756164Ab3FETEl (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jun 2013 15:04:41 -0400 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Nick Dyer Cc: Daniel Kurtz , Henrik Rydberg , Joonyoung Shim , Alan.Bowens@atmel.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pmeerw@pmeerw.net, bleung@chromium.org, olofj@chromium.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/53] Input: atmel_mxt_ts - Add memory access interface via sysfs Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 12:04:37 -0700 Message-ID: <1717403.GgHsbyUkDZ@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com> User-Agent: KMail/4.10.3 (Linux/3.9.4-200.fc18.x86_64; KDE/4.10.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <51AF8730.4010507@itdev.co.uk> References: <1370453866-16534-1-git-send-email-nick.dyer@itdev.co.uk> <7380889.l4hHqCT0mm@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com> <51AF8730.4010507@itdev.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1622 Lines: 40 On Wednesday, June 05, 2013 07:45:04 PM Nick Dyer wrote: > Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Wednesday, June 05, 2013 06:37:03 PM Nick Dyer wrote: > >> Atmel maXTouch chips can be addressed via an "Object Based Protocol" > >> which > >> defines how i2c registers are mapped to different functions within the > >> chips. This interface exposes the register map and allows user-space > >> utilities to inspect and alter object configuration, and to view > >> diagnostic > >> data, while the device is running. > > > > I think if the driver was to use regmap then this fucntionality will > > already be there as regmap exports registers via debugfs. > > Yes, this was suggested in the past and I spent some time looking into it. > > We have made a deliberate choice to implement this via sysfs rather than > debugfs since it needs to work on devices that don't have debugfs enabled. Then they will have to enable it. Re-implementing something because someone might not enable needed subsystem is not a good idea. Let's say somebody disabled I2C - will you write your own implementation because of that? Of course not, you just say that for given functionality it is a prerequisite. > > In addition, there are some quirks about the way in which we have to > read/write registers which means regmap isn't a good fit. Could you please elaborate more on this? Thanks. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/