Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756618Ab3FFBth (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jun 2013 21:49:37 -0400 Received: from mail-qa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.216.44]:34887 "EHLO mail-qa0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752960Ab3FFBtg (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jun 2013 21:49:36 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 18:49:29 -0700 From: Tejun Heo To: Glauber Costa Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Paul Turner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Frederic Weisbecker , devel@openvz.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/11] per-cgroup cpu-stat Message-ID: <20130606014929.GS10693@mtj.dyndns.org> References: <1369825402-31046-1-git-send-email-glommer@openvz.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1369825402-31046-1-git-send-email-glommer@openvz.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1490 Lines: 35 Hello, Glauber. On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:03:11PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > I am *not* going as far as marking cpuacct deprecated, because I think it > deserves a special discussion (even though my position in this matter is widely > known), but all the infrastructure to make it happen is here. But after this, > it should be a matter of setting a flag (or not). I'll ensure that cpuacct can't be used with sane_behavior from cgroup core side, so that it can be deprecated with multiple hierarchies eventually. > Through this patchset I am making cpu cgroup provide the same functionality of > cpuacct, and now with a more clear semantics, I attempt to provide userspace > with enough information to reconstruct per-container version of files like > "/proc/stat". In particular, we are interested in knowing the per-cgroup slices > of user time, system time, wait time, number of processes, and a variety of > statistics. > > To make sure we can count nr of switches correctly, I am ressurecting one of > Peter's patches that apparently got nowhere in the past. I generally agree with the approach but which tree is it based on? Can you please let me know the base commit so that I can review the series properly? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/