Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933212Ab3FFLsY (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jun 2013 07:48:24 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:38231 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933168Ab3FFLr7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jun 2013 07:47:59 -0400 Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 13:47:46 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Wang YanQing , gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] TTY:vt: convert remain take_over_console's users to do_take_over_console Message-ID: <20130606114746.GA3659@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> References: <20130521051511.GA11435@udknight> <20130604201317.GA16303@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <20130606012312.GA2001@udknight> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130606012312.GA2001@udknight> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1705 Lines: 46 On Thu 2013-06-06 09:23:13, Wang YanQing wrote: > On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 10:13:18PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Tue 2013-05-21 13:15:12, Wang YanQing wrote: > > > Impact: > > > 1:convert all remain take_over_console to do_take_over_console > > > > This is step backwards. > > What is step backwards? do_take_over_console appear MUCH MUCH later in kernel > than take_over_console, do_take_over_console is the new API, I can't understand > what is step backwards. "do_*" is internal api, "*" is external api. You sprinkle internal api all over the place. > > > --- a/arch/alpha/kernel/console.c > > > +++ b/arch/alpha/kernel/console.c > > > @@ -61,7 +61,9 @@ locate_and_init_vga(void *(*sel_func)(void *, void *)) > > > > > > /* Set the VGA hose and init the new console. */ > > > pci_vga_hose = hose; > > > - take_over_console(&vga_con, 0, MAX_NR_CONSOLES-1, 1); > > > + console_lock(); > > > + do_take_over_console(&vga_con, 0, MAX_NR_CONSOLES-1, 1); > > > + console_unlock(); > > > } > > > > Original was better. > > Except reduce some console_lock/unlock scatter scattered in kernel, I > can't see the "BETTER", and it is not a BIG problem for the benefit to > unify the API. You replaced "calling exported function" with "calling internal-sounding function and adding locking too". Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/