MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1733666.lHUBcfUXq9@flatron>
References: <CAPweEDx3mAy40BZrzrKPRbvg7vKMj7KevDQ3m_v4p6Yo50eSGg@mail.gmail.com>
	<1370475609.20454.44.camel@localhost>
	<CAPweEDwS3tR=wh-bZJb3vqR8fVQra=3XxDitowGRdH9c7WRfmQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1733666.lHUBcfUXq9@flatron>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 13:24:57 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPweEDzYLDzh_-OWU61dtVhajZ40QpQgZKHFYDsh3FgF=r9_ag@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re:
 Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))
From: "luke.leighton" <luke.leighton@gmail.com>
To: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Linux on small ARM machines 
	<arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk>,
        devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org>,
        Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        debian-arm@lists.debian.org, "jonsmirl@gmail.com" <jonsmirl@gmail.com>,
        debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 894
Lines: 19

On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't see any other solution here than moving all the Allwinner code to
> DT (as it has been suggested in this thread several times already), as
> this is the only hardware description method supported by ARM Linux.

 i repeat again: please state, explicitly and unequivocably that you -
linux kernel developers - are happy that the reach of linux and
gnu/linux OSes is dramatically reduced due to this intransigent
position.

 or, tomasz, please state that you, tomasz, represent each and every
one of the linux kernel developers so that i do not need to keep
asking.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/