Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753975Ab3FFTlw (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jun 2013 15:41:52 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:57837 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752830Ab3FFTlu (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jun 2013 15:41:50 -0400 Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 21:41:34 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Matthew Garrett Cc: Matt Fleming , Linux EFI , Jiri Kosina , X86-ML , LKML , Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86, efi: Add an efi= kernel command line parameter Message-ID: <20130606194134.GN20972@pd.tnic> References: <1370177770-26661-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de> <1370177770-26661-4-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de> <20130606104224.GH30420@console-pimps.org> <20130606132603.GD20972@pd.tnic> <20130606175052.GA1285@srcf.ucam.org> <20130606185140.GK20972@pd.tnic> <20130606193548.GA2946@srcf.ucam.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130606193548.GA2946@srcf.ucam.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 828 Lines: 22 On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:35:48PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > No, I think that's the wrong thing to do. We should set up the current > mappings and the 1:1 mappings, and pass the current mappings through > SetVirtualAddressMap(). That matches the behaviour of Windows. And when do we use the 1:1 mappings and when the current mappings when doing runtime calls? Also, would the 1:1 mappings even work if not passed through SetVirtualAddressMap? I'm sensing a "yes" but I don't know... -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/