Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 05:32:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 05:32:52 -0400 Received: from mail.ocs.com.au ([203.34.97.2]:9996 "HELO mail.ocs.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 05:32:52 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Keith Owens To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OT] backtrace In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 03 Oct 2002 09:31:06 +0100." <3D9C004A.3080006@corvil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 19:38:09 +1000 Message-ID: <7453.1033637889@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1136 Lines: 25 On Thu, 03 Oct 2002 09:31:06 +0100, Padraig Brady wrote: >Sorry to go off topic but this tip is just too useful IMHO. >You can do the same in userspace with glibc. Details here: >http://www.iol.ie/~padraiga/backtrace.c info libc, /backtrace. Note that certain compiler optimisations may interfere with obtaining a valid backtrace. Function inlining causes the inlined function to not have a stack frame; tail call optimisation replaces one stack frame with another; frame pointer elimination will stop `backtrace' from interpreting the stack contents correctly. Most architectures compile with -fomit-frame-pointer (except for ARM where RMK does it differently). Neither gdb not glibc can cope with kernel code built with -fomit-frame-pointer. See the horrible heuristics kdb has to apply to get any sort of backtrace on i386. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/