Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754422Ab3FGAGm (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jun 2013 20:06:42 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f172.google.com ([209.85.192.172]:60953 "EHLO mail-pd0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752944Ab3FGAGl (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jun 2013 20:06:41 -0400 Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 17:06:37 -0700 From: Tejun Heo To: Glauber Costa Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Paul Turner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Frederic Weisbecker , devel@openvz.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/11] per-cgroup cpu-stat Message-ID: <20130607000637.GT5045@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1369825402-31046-1-git-send-email-glommer@openvz.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1369825402-31046-1-git-send-email-glommer@openvz.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 893 Lines: 22 On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:03:11PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > I am coming again with this series, hoping this is a better time for you all to > look at it. > > I am *not* going as far as marking cpuacct deprecated, because I think it > deserves a special discussion (even though my position in this matter is widely > known), but all the infrastructure to make it happen is here. But after this, > it should be a matter of setting a flag (or not). Things look generally good to me upto patch 6. Maybe we can combine "adding cpuacct stats to cpu" and "re-using schedstats" but no strong opinion. Peter, what do you think? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/