Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 07:58:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 07:58:52 -0400 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:60432 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 07:58:51 -0400 Message-ID: <3D9C323C.1050504@namesys.com> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 16:04:12 +0400 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Theodore Ts'o" CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [STUPID TESTCASE] ext3 htree vs. reiserfs on 2.5.40-mm1 References: <20021001195914.GC6318@stingr.net> <20021001204330.GO3000@clusterfs.com> <20021002104859.GD6318@stingr.net> <20021002165454.GV3000@clusterfs.com> <20021003003739.GA4381@think.thunk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 697 Lines: 25 Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > >Just to be clear, the limit which Paul is referring to is just simply >a matter of creating the filesystem with a sufficient number of >inodes. (i.e., mke2fs -N 1200000). Yes, having a dynamic inode table >would be good, but in practice sysadmins know how many inodes are >needed in advance. > > - Ted > > > No they don't. Average space wastage is more than 50% because sysadmins have to be conservative. Hans - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/