Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755464Ab3FGONL (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jun 2013 10:13:11 -0400 Received: from mail-oa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.219.44]:62828 "EHLO mail-oa0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754280Ab3FGONI (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jun 2013 10:13:08 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20130607152718.4b458087@amdc308.digital.local> References: <1370502472-7249-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <1370502472-7249-3-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <20130606134903.5f69b8fb@amdc308.digital.local> <20130607152718.4b458087@amdc308.digital.local> Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 19:43:07 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] cpufreq:boost: Add support for software based CPU frequency boost From: Viresh Kumar To: Lukasz Majewski Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocky" , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , Linux PM list , Vincent Guittot , Jonghwa Lee , Myungjoo Ham , linux-kernel , Lukasz Majewski , Andre Przywara , Daniel Lezcano , Lists linaro-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1803 Lines: 44 Hi Lukasz, On 7 June 2013 18:57, Lukasz Majewski wrote: I hope you agreed to all the other comments I gave as I don't see an explicit reply below each of these. I have seen people missing these in past, so what would be better to do is: - either reply below each one of them and say yes or no.. - Or write once below many comments and say: All above comments are accepted. So, that Reviewer is assured that you haven't missed anything. > I would prefer to have following fields in the cpufreq_boost structure: > struct cpufreq_boost { > unsigned int max_boost_freq; /*boost max freq*/ > unsigned int max_normal_freq; /*max normal freq > int (*low_level_boost) (int state); > bool boost_en; /* indicate if boost is enabled */ > } > > The max_{boost|normal}_freq fields will be filed at > ret = cpufreq_driver->init(policy); > > Thanks to them I will avoid calling many times routine, which extracts > from freq_table maximal boost and normal frequencies. > > I could define those variables in the exynos-cpufreq.c driver, but I > think, that they are more suitable to be embedded at cpufreq_boost > structure. I understand that you need these variables (I will still look how you are using them in next version). But they are per policy and driver isn't responsible for maintaining them. If they are required then cpufreq core must find them out and keep in struct cpufreq_policy (as they are policy dependent).. So, remove this structure from cpufreq_driver and embed variables directly. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/