Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755603Ab3FGOuN (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 7 Jun 2013 10:50:13 -0400
Received: from eu1sys200aog108.obsmtp.com ([207.126.144.125]:59922 "HELO
	eu1sys200aog108.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755464Ab3FGOuK (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 7 Jun 2013 10:50:10 -0400
From: joem <joem@martindale-electric.co.uk>
To: Linux on small ARM machines <arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk>
CC: "debian-arm@lists.debian.org" <debian-arm@lists.debian.org>,
        devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        ARM Linux Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "debian-kernel@lists.debian.org" <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re:
 Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))
Thread-Topic: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re:
 Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))
Thread-Index: AQHOYkQeo1daxZXQdEOktOQOW5Uoa5kntruAgAAD4QCAAAcPAIAAyfEAgAAIKwCAATuLgIAAAiYAgAAFCgCAAHCcgA==
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 14:49:28 +0000
Message-ID: <1370616567.2433.20.camel@jm-desktop>
References: <CAPweEDx3mAy40BZrzrKPRbvg7vKMj7KevDQ3m_v4p6Yo50eSGg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAKON4OxDD5orX2w-_+d5kawTGXbE3KKj2QLERo9m7=NiUSXhgQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <51AFA6DD.3000202@wwwdotorg.org>
	 <CAPweEDz=hFxXW3XF9CSNZpEFSjayb5an1E8Xze1_uQcCZONVxg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1370469574.18839.33.camel@localhost>
	 <CAPweEDxMpeJc-w=Yd7d2OT=UisRBp2rxf-MPMDUCOG3EyJz1GQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAKON4OxwyV2f_iTEb5RnP_azc7EsSxPdku_TY5WLWxN7USiY1Q@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAPweEDw1BabE0cmT5fxZ3Z9p9EH508M3Nzcqk2VcO0oz-qYsvg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1370475609.20454.44.camel@localhost>
	 <CAPweEDwS3tR=wh-bZJb3vqR8fVQra=3XxDitowGRdH9c7WRfmQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1370477958.20454.68.camel@localhost>
	 <CAPweEDyPffcN9cNJ10ZHt+AZJHTRdU0LMfCGM_756uAbf+NEBQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <51B085C6.3000605@gmail.com>
	 <CAPweEDwR_NWUSi-j53m8MuoaV1RxM4wNNXtRioa2CjNdYqEtzQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <51B19046.5040401@gmail.com>
	 <CAPweEDxfWcv7HSDuO6Uc751iiPg9ngDQc5UB7mbxwBespwF_7Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPweEDxfWcv7HSDuO6Uc751iiPg9ngDQc5UB7mbxwBespwF_7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: joem <joem@martindale-electric.co.uk>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [81.149.149.147]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <B81113C12F66F242BDFE34395B1D63AC@swifthost.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id r57EoMsp021072
Content-Length: 879
Lines: 19


> > SoC vendors are free to join the discussion, and many SoC vendors are part
> > of the kernel community, so calling this unilateral is plain wrong.
> 
>  you're free to believe that, vladimir.  i've explained why that
> hasn't happened, in prior messages.  can we move forward, please?

I prefer it if the "vladimir" troll (and fellow trolls)
make requests for one of us to make or do something instead of
constantly whining and wasting time.

After all we are attached to funds and resources ready to
deploy if something sounds a good idea and gets a vote.

To vladimir - please put your thoughts in a blog where it belongs.
If its important, I'm sure others would offer comment
and take you up on your thoughts.

????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay?ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m????????????I?