Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 08:06:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 08:06:07 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust51.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.51]:5872 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 08:06:06 -0400 Subject: Re: O(1) scheduler for 2.4.(19|20-pre.)? From: Alan Cox To: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <200210031148.23823.roy@karlsbakk.net> References: <200210031148.23823.roy@karlsbakk.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 03 Oct 2002 13:19:04 +0100 Message-Id: <1033647544.28022.2.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 632 Lines: 14 On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 10:48, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > 1. Do I need the O(1) scheduler to run a heavily I/O bound server application > with some 200-500 concurrent threads? > 2. If so - can I find the O(1) scheduler somewhere for 2.4? 2.4.19-ac/2.4.20-ac, Red Hat 7.3, Red Hat 8.0, and probably quite a few other places. I think Robert had a set of patches versus plain 2.4.19 too - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/