Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756184Ab3FGTRE (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jun 2013 15:17:04 -0400 Received: from mail-bk0-f45.google.com ([209.85.214.45]:44846 "EHLO mail-bk0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755878Ab3FGTRC (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jun 2013 15:17:02 -0400 From: Tomasz Figa To: "luke.leighton" Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Linux on small ARM machines , devicetree-discuss , Stephen Warren , Linux Kernel Mailing List , debian-arm@lists.debian.org, "jonsmirl@gmail.com" , debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, Arnd Bergmann , Maxime Ripard , Olof Johansson , Russell King - ARM Linux , Thomas Petazzoni Subject: Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1)) Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 21:16:58 +0200 Message-ID: <1506423.MBs7Fu8QWI@flatron> User-Agent: KMail/4.10.4 (Linux/3.9.4-gentoo; KDE/4.10.4; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <4466665.6pIGCIdISn@flatron> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2200 Lines: 61 On Friday 07 of June 2013 20:02:03 luke.leighton wrote: > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > >Seeing from your posts you don't have any knowledge on how Linux kernel > > > > development works > > check back to 2004. $ git log --oneline --author="Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton" | wc -l 0 $ git log --oneline --author="lkcl@lkcl.net" | wc -l 0 $ git log --oneline --author="Luke Leighton" | wc -l 0 That's an -ENOPATCH for me. > > and even on how Allwinner's cooperation with our > > community looks (and seem to be completely closed to our effort of > > showing you the reality), > > no - just f*****g busy, tomasz Just like many of us, I guess. > > so I'm not sure if you are the right person to take any > > of those roles... > > well, tough. get me up to speed, *fast*. please stop wasting time > like this: get me up to speed. i may not be the best person but i am > in the right place at the right time, and nobody else is going to be > able to step into this role in time. > > so i may not be the best person that you *think* i am, but i'm the > person you've got. time's ticking. can we get on please? > > > I'd suggest Maxime Ripard or someone else from Free Electrons to be > > responsible for communication with Allwinner instead. > > you're welcome to suggest, however they do not have the contacts that > i have (many of which are indirect anyway), and i am not going to > introduce him to them either, in case they jeapordise the critical > business relationships that took my associates 4 years to establish. Well, I'm quitting this discussion right now, as it doesn't seem to be of any use or might be even counter-productive. I have already showed my view on this matter (and even given you some proposals for them), got it confirmed by several other people and got nothing from you that could make me reconsider anything. Thank you for your time. Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/