Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:04:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:04:46 -0400 Received: from [203.117.131.12] ([203.117.131.12]:3050 "EHLO gort.metaparadigm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:04:45 -0400 Message-ID: <3D9C4FA8.10201@metaparadigm.com> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 22:09:44 +0800 From: Michael Clark User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020913 Debian/1.1-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox Cc: Alexander Viro , Andreas Dilger , Lars Marowsky-Bree , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove LVM from 2.5 (resend) References: <3D9BDA8D.5080700@metaparadigm.com> <1033648730.28022.8.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 894 Lines: 29 On 10/03/02 20:38, Alan Cox wrote: > On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 06:50, Michael Clark wrote: > >>>... and you don't need EVMS for that. >> >>But EVMS would be an excellent substitute in the mean time. >> >>Better to having something excellent now than something perfect but >>too late. > > > You can see who around here has maintained kernel code and who hasnt. > You don't want a substitute in the mean time, because then you have to > get rid of it Like LVM ;) /me submits to the masters and waits in subjugation. Just hoping for good Volume Manager in 2.6 and EVMS looks good to me from an end user perspective, and also seems quite timely. ~mc - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/