Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:46:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:46:03 -0400 Received: from carisma.slowglass.com ([195.224.96.167]:33548 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:46:02 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:51:22 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Alan Cox Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Greg Ungerer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.40-ac1 Message-ID: <20021003155122.A20437@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Alan Cox , Greg Ungerer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20021003151707.A17513@infradead.org> <200210031420.g93EK3L07983@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200210031420.g93EK3L07983@devserv.devel.redhat.com>; from alan@redhat.com on Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 10:20:03AM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 757 Lines: 17 On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 10:20:03AM -0400, Alan Cox wrote: > > The sepearate one is horrible maintaince wise. Please introduce > > CONFIG_MMU and try to make as many _files_ in mm/ conditional on > > those. Else use the proper ways (cond_syscall(), inline stubs) to > > hide the differences. > > The two are so different I think that keeping it seperate is actually the > right idea personally. Did you actually take a look? Many files are basically the same and other are just totally stubbed out in nommu. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/