Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:28:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:28:48 -0400 Received: from dbl.q-ag.de ([80.146.160.66]:12465 "EHLO dbl.q-ag.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:28:47 -0400 Message-ID: <3D9C6376.5080802@colorfullife.com> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 17:34:14 +0200 From: Manfred Spraul User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 4.0) X-Accept-Language: en, de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.40-ac1 References: <3D9C5827.70703@colorfullife.com> <1033658256.28814.0.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 566 Lines: 18 Alan Cox wrote: > > The checks I did were that it seemed to produce the same data in both > cases. So if it was wrong before (using set_bit) its probably wrong now. > Which arch? On ppc, __set_bit() stores in big endian format, i.e. the cpu_to_le32 would be wrong I try to figure out what set_bit() does. -- Manfred - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/