Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 23:14:49 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] cpufreq: ondemand: Change the calculation of
 target frequency
Message-ID: <20130609211449.GA5517@pd.tnic>
References: <q46r5iepl3sunqe5eemv66hk.1370694869222@email.android.com>
 <20130609162653.GA5004@pd.tnic>
 <51B4C497.2030308@semaphore.gr>
 <7661669.NhG4BEI8zO@vostro.rjw.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7661669.NhG4BEI8zO@vostro.rjw.lan>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 954
Lines: 26

On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 10:58:51PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Can you possibly prepare a graph showing both the execution time
> and energy consumption for several different loop durations in your
> program (let's keep the 5000 us sleep for now), including multiples of
> sampling_rate as well as some other durations?

Judgind by the times in C0 one of the cores spent, this small program
is single-threaded and is a microbenchmark. And you know how optimizing
against a microbenchmark doesn't really make a lot of sense.

I wonder if lmbench or aim9 or whatever would make more sense to try
here...

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/