Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751149Ab3FJEEG (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2013 00:04:06 -0400 Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:50512 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750707Ab3FJEEE convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2013 00:04:04 -0400 From: "J, KEERTHY" To: Stephen Warren CC: "Cousson, Benoit" , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "ldewangan@nvidia.com" , "grant.likely@secretlab.ca" , "swarren@nvidia.com" , "sameo@linux.intel.com" , "gg@slimlogic.co.uk" , "lee.jones@linaro.org" Subject: RE: [PATCH] ARM: dts: add dtsi for palmas Thread-Topic: [PATCH] ARM: dts: add dtsi for palmas Thread-Index: AQHOY3QMPa6kmxyASkaofO5W52VCRJkqJRKAgAQxKl8= Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 04:03:37 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1370604504-32310-1-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com>,<51B23AD5.8060006@wwwdotorg.org> In-Reply-To: <51B23AD5.8060006@wwwdotorg.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.24.170.154] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2411 Lines: 65 Hi Stephen, Thanks for the review comments. ________________________________________ From: Stephen Warren [swarren@wwwdotorg.org] Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2013 1:26 AM To: J, KEERTHY Cc: Cousson, Benoit; devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; ldewangan@nvidia.com; grant.likely@secretlab.ca; swarren@nvidia.com; sameo@linux.intel.com; gg@slimlogic.co.uk; lee.jones@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: add dtsi for palmas On 06/07/2013 05:28 AM, J Keerthy wrote: > Adds palmas mfd and palmas regulator nodes. This is > based on the patch series: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg89957.html > > The device tree nodes are based on: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/6/25 > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/palmas.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/palmas.dtsi > +&palmas { Hmmm. That (i.e. requiring the board file to declare the node, then setting up all the content by later including this file) is an interesting approach. I guess it's reasonable. The one issue is that it makes it a little harder for the board file to override any of the properties in this file., although it certainly is possible by including those overrides after the include. Irrespective of that, some comments on this: > + palmas_pmic { > + ti,ldo6-vibrator; For example, what if the board doesn't want to have the property set? > + > + regulators { > + smps123_reg: smps123 { > + regulator-name = "smps123"; > + regulator-min-microvolt = < 600000>; > + regulator-max-microvolt = <1500000>; Or what if the board wants to limit the voltage range of this regulator due to what it's used for on the board. > + regulator-always-on; > + regulator-boot-on; And those two properties are almost certainly board-specific policy. Totally agree to all the above concerns. So can we have a custom .dtsi file for a board+pmic combination? Or have only the required properties over ridden in the board file? Regards, Keerthy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/