Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:00:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:00:52 -0400 Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.106]:18852 "EHLO e6.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:00:50 -0400 Importance: Normal Sensitivity: Subject: Re: [Evms-devel] Re: EVMS Submission for 2.5 To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: "Kevin M Corry" , torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, evms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.4 June 8, 2000 Message-ID: From: "Steve Pratt" Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:09:37 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01ML072/01/M/IBM(Release 5.0.11 |July 29, 2002) at 10/03/2002 12:05:17 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 876 Lines: 29 Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> subdirectories were created: drivers/evms/ for the main source code, >> and include/linux/evms/ for the header files. >What's the reason to not have the headers under drivers/evms. None, really. Why does md put it's headers in include/linux/raid ??? We can put them wherever. > And why don'T you just use drivers-md like all other volume management drivers? Because it is getting crowded. Why does every filesystem create it's own directory in fs? Maybe drivers/vm/md drivers/vm/dm drivers/vm/evms would be better. Again, we can put it wherever, this just seems like a logical place. Steve - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/