Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753010Ab3FJNWg (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:22:36 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:55766 "EHLO mail-ob0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752665Ab3FJNWe (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:22:34 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20130610152027.3133d1ab@amdc308.digital.local> References: <1370502472-7249-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <1370502472-7249-6-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <20130606155815.GB21272@pd.tnic> <20130610152027.3133d1ab@amdc308.digital.local> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:52:33 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] cpufreq:boost:Kconfig: Enable boost support at Kconfig From: Viresh Kumar To: Lukasz Majewski Cc: Borislav Petkov , "Rafael J. Wysocky" , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , Linux PM list , Vincent Guittot , Jonghwa Lee , Myungjoo Ham , linux-kernel , Lukasz Majewski , Andre Przywara , Daniel Lezcano Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 828 Lines: 22 On 10 June 2013 18:50, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > Hi, > >> On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:07:52AM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote: >> > Enable/disable support for BOOST. New flag - CPU_FREQ_BOOST has been >> > defined for that. >> >> What's the reason for this? Why would you want to not compile-in the >> boosting code? > > I think that this flag could be removed and the "boost" could be > compiled-in permanently. > > Viresh, what is your opinion? Yes, Borislav is correct. I haven't actually reviewed these last patches as I saw lots of issues with first one :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/