Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:46:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:46:51 -0400 Received: from adsl-66-127-195-58.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([66.127.195.58]:9182 "EHLO panda.mostang.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:46:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: David Mosberger-Tang To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OT] backtrace In-Reply-To: <7453.1033637889@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> References: <3D9C004A.3080006@corvil.com> <7453.1033637889@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-Id: <20021003154651Z261325-8741+1357@vger.kernel.org> Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 11:46:51 -0400 Content-Length: 857 Lines: 19 >>>>> On Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:50:03 +0200, Keith Owens said: Keith> Most architectures compile with -fomit-frame-pointer (except Keith> for ARM where RMK does it differently). Neither gdb not Keith> glibc can cope with kernel code built with Keith> -fomit-frame-pointer. See the horrible heuristics kdb has to Keith> apply to get any sort of backtrace on i386. Keith knows this, but just to be clear: there is no problem unwinding across functions compiled with -fomit-frame-pointer on ia64. (Other platforms could do the same if they took advantage of DWARF2 unwind info.) --david - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/