Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:24:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:24:56 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust51.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.51]:8434 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:24:55 -0400 Subject: Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (WAS Re: [PATCH-RFC] 4 of 4 - New problem logging macros, SCSI RAIDdevice) From: Alan Cox To: Linus Torvalds Cc: jbradford@dial.pipex.com, jgarzik@pobox.com, kessler@us.ibm.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , saw@saw.sw.com.sg, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 03 Oct 2002 17:37:58 +0100 Message-Id: <1033663078.28850.19.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 801 Lines: 19 On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 16:57, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 jbradford@dial.pipex.com wrote: > > > > I think we should stick to incrementing the major number when binary > > compatibility is broken. > > "Stick to"? We've never had that as any criteria for major numbers in the > kernel. Binary compatibility has _never_ been broken as a release policy, > only as a "that code is old, and we've given people 5 years to migrate to > the new system calls, the old ones are TOAST". We've generally done better than that. Libc 2.2.2 stil works - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/