Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752387Ab3FJWK7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:10:59 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:4500 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752096Ab3FJWK6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:10:58 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=Du3UCRD+ c=1 sm=0 a=rXTBtCOcEpjy1lPqhTCpEQ==:17 a=mNMOxpOpBa8A:10 a=eB9Tj_0eLcoA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=XIlBwW5Cg4gA:10 a=VwQbUJbxAAAA:8 a=D19gQVrFAAAA:8 a=IjJRYWstNwOpoeDe-NIA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=rXTBtCOcEpjy1lPqhTCpEQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 74.67.115.198 Message-ID: <1370902256.9844.131.camel@gandalf.local.home> Subject: Re: Another RCU trace. (3.10-rc5) From: Steven Rostedt To: Dave Jones Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Linux Kernel , fweisbec@gmail.com, Peter Zijlstra Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:10:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130610215421.GA31251@redhat.com> References: <20130610195145.GA26068@redhat.com> <20130610203355.GO5146@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130610210123.GA27154@redhat.com> <20130610211803.GR5146@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1370900256.9844.128.camel@gandalf.local.home> <20130610215421.GA31251@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2095 Lines: 54 On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 17:54 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 05:37:36PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 14:18 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 05:01:23PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 01:33:55PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I saw some of Steven's patches get merged on Friday, is there anything else > > > > > > outstanding that didn't make it in yet that I could test ? > > > > > > Or is this another new bug ? > > > > > > > > > > I have three fixes queued up at: > > > > > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git rcu/urgent > > > > > > > > > > Kind of hard to tell whether they are relevant given the interleaved > > > > > stack traces, but can't hurt to try them out. > > > > > > > > Here's another. Looks different. > > > > > > I bet that commit d6284099 (trace: Allow idle-safe tracepoints to be > > > called from irq) from the above git archive fixes this one. Just don't > > > ask how much I am willing to bet. ;-) > > > > Don't bet much ;-) This has nothing to do with tracepoints. It's due to > > the function tracer. > > dammit, 20 minutes after I finally cloned the repo. > Can we go back to posting diffs instead of hashes please ? > > So while updating my list of bugs I've found this cycle, I noticed > I'd already posted this one a month ago on -rc2. > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/21/327 > which led us to this patch https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/24/379 > After which I hit a bunch of what seem to be other RCU related bugs. > > So maybe that patch was a winner after all and got dropped ? I don't think it got dropped, it just seemed that it would go through Peter: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/6/456 -- Steve > > Dave > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/