Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 13:12:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 13:12:35 -0400 Received: from svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com ([24.136.46.5]:37895 "EHLO svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 13:12:34 -0400 Subject: Re: O(1) scheduler for 2.4.(19|20-pre.)? From: Robert Love To: Alan Cox Cc: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <1033647544.28022.2.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> References: <200210031148.23823.roy@karlsbakk.net> <1033647544.28022.2.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 03 Oct 2002 13:17:27 -0400 Message-Id: <1033665449.909.24.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 743 Lines: 23 On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 08:19, Alan Cox wrote: > 2.4.19-ac/2.4.20-ac, Red Hat 7.3, Red Hat 8.0, and probably quite a > few other places. I think Robert had a set of patches versus plain > 2.4.19 too Yep, see: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/sched/ingo-O1/ I would recommend using 2.4-ac over mainline with my patches, however. Alan's tree is well-tested and I send him scheduler fixes quicker than I update my own patches :) It has lots of other nice bits, too. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/