Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 13:13:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 13:13:36 -0400 Received: from svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com ([24.136.46.5]:39431 "EHLO svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 13:13:35 -0400 Subject: Re: O(1) scheduler for 2.4.(19|20-pre.)? From: Robert Love To: Brandon Low Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20021003120329.H6891@lostlogicx.com> References: <200210031148.23823.roy@karlsbakk.net> <1033647544.28022.2.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20021003120329.H6891@lostlogicx.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 03 Oct 2002 13:18:29 -0400 Message-Id: <1033665510.743.27.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 813 Lines: 20 On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 13:03, Brandon Low wrote: > Unfortunately some of the scheduler bits that have been merged into > 2.4.20-pre have broken the nice patch that robert has, I'm hoping he can > re-diff it for us (me) because I like to have the option of getting O(1) > without using Alan's tree. I just put a 2.4.19 final patch up. I will do a 2.4.20-pre/2.4.20 patch eventually but it is not at the top of my list. I would not think managing the rejects is too difficult. It is a much higher priority keeping the 2.4-ac and 2.5 scheduler sane. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/