Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754726Ab3FKLJv (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jun 2013 07:09:51 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55290 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754625Ab3FKLJp (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jun 2013 07:09:45 -0400 From: Jeff Layton To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, matthew@wil.cx, bfields@fieldses.org Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, sage@inktank.com, smfrench@gmail.com, swhiteho@redhat.com, Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, piastryyy@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH v2 05/14] locks: encapsulate the fl_link list handling Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 07:08:59 -0400 Message-Id: <1370948948-31784-6-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1370948948-31784-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> References: <1370948948-31784-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3022 Lines: 108 Move the fl_link list handling routines into a separate set of helpers. Also move the global list handling out of locks_insert_block, and into the caller that ends up triggering it as that allows us to eliminate the IS_POSIX check there. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields --- fs/locks.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c index c186649..e451d18 100644 --- a/fs/locks.c +++ b/fs/locks.c @@ -484,13 +484,38 @@ static int posix_same_owner(struct file_lock *fl1, struct file_lock *fl2) return fl1->fl_owner == fl2->fl_owner; } +/* Remove a blocker or lock from one of the global lists */ +static inline void +locks_insert_global_blocked(struct file_lock *waiter) +{ + list_add(&waiter->fl_link, &blocked_list); +} + +static inline void +locks_delete_global_blocked(struct file_lock *waiter) +{ + list_del_init(&waiter->fl_link); +} + +static inline void +locks_insert_global_locks(struct file_lock *waiter) +{ + list_add_tail(&waiter->fl_link, &file_lock_list); +} + +static inline void +locks_delete_global_locks(struct file_lock *waiter) +{ + list_del_init(&waiter->fl_link); +} + /* Remove waiter from blocker's block list. * When blocker ends up pointing to itself then the list is empty. */ static void __locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter) { + locks_delete_global_blocked(waiter); list_del_init(&waiter->fl_block); - list_del_init(&waiter->fl_link); waiter->fl_next = NULL; } @@ -514,8 +539,6 @@ static void locks_insert_block(struct file_lock *blocker, BUG_ON(!list_empty(&waiter->fl_block)); list_add_tail(&waiter->fl_block, &blocker->fl_block); waiter->fl_next = blocker; - if (IS_POSIX(blocker)) - list_add(&waiter->fl_link, &blocked_list); } /* @@ -543,13 +566,13 @@ static void locks_wake_up_blocks(struct file_lock *blocker) */ static void locks_insert_lock(struct file_lock **pos, struct file_lock *fl) { - list_add(&fl->fl_link, &file_lock_list); - fl->fl_nspid = get_pid(task_tgid(current)); /* insert into file's list */ fl->fl_next = *pos; *pos = fl; + + locks_insert_global_locks(fl); } /* @@ -562,9 +585,10 @@ static void locks_delete_lock(struct file_lock **thisfl_p) { struct file_lock *fl = *thisfl_p; + locks_delete_global_locks(fl); + *thisfl_p = fl->fl_next; fl->fl_next = NULL; - list_del_init(&fl->fl_link); if (fl->fl_nspid) { put_pid(fl->fl_nspid); @@ -830,6 +854,7 @@ static int __posix_lock_file(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request, str goto out; error = FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED; locks_insert_block(fl, request); + locks_insert_global_blocked(request); goto out; } } -- 1.7.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/