Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754704Ab3FKLJu (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jun 2013 07:09:50 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36848 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753579Ab3FKLJn (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jun 2013 07:09:43 -0400 From: Jeff Layton To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, matthew@wil.cx, bfields@fieldses.org Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, sage@inktank.com, smfrench@gmail.com, swhiteho@redhat.com, Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, piastryyy@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH v2 01/14] cifs: use posix_unblock_lock instead of locks_delete_block Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 07:08:55 -0400 Message-Id: <1370948948-31784-2-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1370948948-31784-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> References: <1370948948-31784-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2673 Lines: 81 commit 66189be74 (CIFS: Fix VFS lock usage for oplocked files) exported the locks_delete_block symbol. There's already an exported helper function that provides this capability however, so make cifs use that instead and turn locks_delete_block back into a static function. Note that if fl->fl_next == NULL then this lock has already been through locks_delete_block(), so we should be OK to ignore an ENOENT error here and simply not retry the lock. Cc: Pavel Shilovsky Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields --- fs/cifs/file.c | 2 +- fs/locks.c | 3 +-- include/linux/fs.h | 5 ----- 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c index 48b29d2..44a4f18 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/file.c +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c @@ -999,7 +999,7 @@ try_again: rc = wait_event_interruptible(flock->fl_wait, !flock->fl_next); if (!rc) goto try_again; - locks_delete_block(flock); + posix_unblock_lock(file, flock); } return rc; } diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c index cb424a4..7a02064 100644 --- a/fs/locks.c +++ b/fs/locks.c @@ -496,13 +496,12 @@ static void __locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter) /* */ -void locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter) +static void locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter) { lock_flocks(); __locks_delete_block(waiter); unlock_flocks(); } -EXPORT_SYMBOL(locks_delete_block); /* Insert waiter into blocker's block list. * We use a circular list so that processes can be easily woken up in diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h index 43db02e..b9d7816 100644 --- a/include/linux/fs.h +++ b/include/linux/fs.h @@ -1006,7 +1006,6 @@ extern int vfs_setlease(struct file *, long, struct file_lock **); extern int lease_modify(struct file_lock **, int); extern int lock_may_read(struct inode *, loff_t start, unsigned long count); extern int lock_may_write(struct inode *, loff_t start, unsigned long count); -extern void locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter); extern void lock_flocks(void); extern void unlock_flocks(void); #else /* !CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING */ @@ -1151,10 +1150,6 @@ static inline int lock_may_write(struct inode *inode, loff_t start, return 1; } -static inline void locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter) -{ -} - static inline void lock_flocks(void) { } -- 1.7.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/