Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:11:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:11:12 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:54477 "EHLO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:11:11 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 16:16:25 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@duckman.distro.conectiva To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Alan Cox , Greg Ungerer , Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.40-ac1 In-Reply-To: <20021003155122.A20437@infradead.org> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 925 Lines: 34 On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 10:20:03AM -0400, Alan Cox wrote: > > The two are so different I think that keeping it seperate is actually the > > right idea personally. > > Did you actually take a look? Many files are basically the same and other > are just totally stubbed out in nommu. So how about having one mm/ directory with: 1) the common stuff 2) the MMU stuff 3) the NOMMU stuff ... and some magic in Makefile to select which .c files to compile ? That should keep code duplication to a minimum. regards, Rik -- A: No. Q: Should I include quotations after my reply? http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/