Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:39:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:39:30 -0400 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:47365 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:39:30 -0400 Message-ID: <3D9C9E39.6090804@namesys.com> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 23:44:57 +0400 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Theodore Ts'o" CC: G@thunk.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [STUPID TESTCASE] ext3 htree vs. reiserfs on 2.5.40-mm1 References: <20021001195914.GC6318@stingr.net> <20021001204330.GO3000@clusterfs.com> <20021002104859.GD6318@stingr.net> <20021002165454.GV3000@clusterfs.com> <20021003003739.GA4381@think.thunk.org> <3D9C323C.1050504@namesys.com> <20021003194049.GA16329@think.thunk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 799 Lines: 28 Theodore Ts'o wrote: >On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 04:04:12PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote: > > >>No they don't. Average space wastage is more than 50% because sysadmins >>have to be conservative. >> >> > >Sure, but even a hundred megabytes or two out of a 100 gigabyte drive >is cheap. (Specifically, about fifty cents' worth.) > > - Ted > > > > Usual space wastage is on the order of 5% of total partition size, yes? Allocating 0.1% of your drive for inodes will get you into trouble if a user does something like use mh or read news, etc. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/