Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752443Ab3FKORr (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jun 2013 10:17:47 -0400 Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44]:61012 "EHLO mail-bk0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751260Ab3FKORq (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jun 2013 10:17:46 -0400 Message-ID: <51B73184.10607@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:17:40 +0200 From: Sebastian Hesselbarth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Gleixner CC: Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Rob Landley , John Stultz , Russell King , Jason Cooper , Andrew Lunn , Thomas Petazzoni , Gregory Clement , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] irqchip: add support for Marvell Orion SoCs References: <1370536034-23956-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> <1370536034-23956-2-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> <51B7280B.7080604@gmail.com> <51B72F5C.5020806@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1334 Lines: 33 On 06/11/13 16:13, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: >> On 06/11/13 15:45, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >>> But what about the bit in of that first irq in the cause register? If >>> it's set on entry you call generic_handle_irq() for that as well. So >>> if it's set you need to mask it in stat. If not, then it wants a >>> comment. >> >> I am not sure I can follow. orion_bridge_irq_init() maps the first >> parent irq, i.e. hwirq 0 of orion_irq. The parent irq controller >> clears that irq cause when all corresponding chained irqs are >> cleared. The chained (bridge) irqs are cleared by >> orion_bridge_irq_handler above. > > That makes sense. I got confused by: > > irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 0); > > but now I see that it's mapping irq 0 of the parent interrupt > controller. I'll add a comment before merging it. Great! Just to be sure: Please make that comment refer to just "parent interrupt" but not specifically "parent interrupt 0". It is 0 only for Dove, and irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 0) maps the first passed irq. Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/