Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 14:19:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 14:18:59 -0500 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:38151 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 14:18:45 -0500 Subject: Re: linux 2.2.19pre and thttpd (VM-global problem?) To: andrea@suse.de (Andrea Arcangeli) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 18:50:18 +0000 (GMT) Cc: ppetru@ppetru.net (Petru Paler), pegasus@telemach.net (Jure Pecar), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thttpd@bomb.acme.com In-Reply-To: <20001229165340.C12791@athlon.random> from "Andrea Arcangeli" at Dec 29, 2000 04:53:40 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 09:38:40AM +0200, Petru Paler wrote: > > This is one of the main thttpd design points: run in a select() loop. Since > > it is intended for mainly static workloads, it performs quite well... > > It can't scale in SMP. Your cgi will keep the other CPU occupied, or run two of them. thttpd has superb scaling properties compared to say apache. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/